Which of the following statements describes the decision of the House of Lords in Salomon v A Salomon & Co Ltd (1897)?
A company has unlimited liability for its debts
A company cannot issue floating charges to its members
A company is a legal entity, distinct from its members
A single member cannot form a company
In Lee v Lee’s Air farming Ltd (1960), the court held that a company could not enter into a contract of employment with the person who was its governing director and majority shareholder.
False
True
Which of the following is not regarded as an example of the lifting of the veil of incorporation?
S 213 Insolvency Act 1986
S 214 Insolvency Act 1986
S 14 Companies Act 1985
S 6 Company Directors Disqualification Act 1986
In Tesco Supermarkets Ltd v Nattrass (1974), the House of Lords held that, under the test of identification, a branch manager did not represent the directing mind and will of the defendant company?
True
False
Which of the following statements is not a correct proposition in relation to the role of a promoter of a company?
A person who takes the necessary steps to form a company
A person who owes fiduciary duties to a company
A person who is acts as a director of a company during the course of the promotion of the company
A person who can become a member of a company on incorporation of the company
Which of the following statements does not describe the status of Table A of the Companies (Tables A-F) Regulations 1985?
Table A is a mandatory set of articles of association in all circumstances
Table A is an optional set of articles of association
Table A is can be adopted in full or in part
Table A can be adopted by public and private companies having a share capital
Which of the following statements is a correct proposition in relation to an alteration of the articles of association of a company?
Any alteration must be made by the passing of an ordinary resolution.
Any alteration must be made by the passing of a special resolution of the board of directors.
Any alteration must be in good faith for the benefit of the company as a whole.
Any alteration is not binding on members by virtue of s 14 CA 1985.
Which of the following statements is true?
An ultra vires act is incapable of being ratified
Any contract entered into beyond a company’s stated objects is void
Directors cannot be held liable for ultra vires acts
A shareholder can prevent a company from entering into an ultra vires transaction
Given the existence of s 35(1) CA 1985, it is no longer a requirement for a company to have an objects clause
False
True
The effect of s 332A CA 1985 is to make company contracts voidable where:
The contract is ultra vires and the other party to the contract is a director of the company
The contract is ultra vires
The contract is ultra vires and is ratified by a company in general meeting.
The contract is intra vires and the other party is a director of the company